Search
Recent Post
- Tommy Roe – Sheila (Original 45)
- 1910 Edison AMBEROLA 1A Phonograph Playing “Where Did You Get That Girl?” Billy Murray
- Can you play modern LPs on vintage record players?
- why is there a loud humming noise and woofers moving wierd while playing my turntable ?
- 1957 RCA VICTOR ORTHOPHONIC HIGH FIDELITY RECORD PLAYER
- Scarce VICTORY 45 RPM Record Player – Licensed RCA Model #45-EY-2 Clone – ALMOST!
- Edison Opera phonograph with blue amberol cylinder (taken from the virtual gramophone)
- Where can I get an Ortofon MC10 cartridge for a Sony PS-X5 turntable?
- RCA linear tracking turntable with infrared track detection
- Kitten vs. Record Player
Recent Comments
- seeburgsrock:@fortyfiveplayer ...
- seeburgsrock:@RaymondTVinyl This ...
- toasteroven427:@seeburgsrock I ...
- WCPR1620AM:I also have the ...
- Vinylrecordsneverdie:Very nice phono! I ...
- desoto1961:Great design! So ...
- lrd9999:@Buzzer365 I get it ...
- Ezdduf4kuZ:I bought this ...
- SeattleLA:@icemelongreen Hi. ...
- frankiehiyo:Records were ... R
Popular
- How do I fix a rattle in an old portable record player? (06-20-2011)
- Are turntable stylus interchangeable? (05-20-2011)
- I recently bought a Crosley phonograph/CD player. It will only work plugged into certain outlets in my home.? (04-04-2010)
- The yellow placed in a 45rpm record to keep it from sliding across the turntable is called what? (03-05-2010)
- Replacement Record Player Needle for Three-in-One Audio Media Center (09-13-2011)
- How can I hook up an old record player to a newer sound system? (11-16-2009)
- Salvation Turntable + Terminator T3Pro Air-bearing Tonearm (06-08-2011)
- how do i connect my record player to play out of my computer speakers? (02-12-2010)
- how can i change the stylus on a grado turntable cartridge,,,is it easy??!!? (12-08-2009)
- How do I know if my record player needs a new stylus (or needle)? (11-03-2010)
would a monaural portable record player sound a lot different from a stereophonic one?
March 8th, 2010 by adminI found one that looks nice. Are most vintage portable turntables monaural? thanks very much
If it’s recorded in mono, it will sound the same in mono, even if played on stereo equipment. Stereo material, however, will sound distinctly diferent. Stereo consists of a phase relationship between the ears that gives depth (direction) to sound. Combining that depth into a single channel removes any spatial relationship.
Original vinyl discs were mono, in which a stylus (needle) would travel in a groove that consisted of bumps along the bottom that translated into frequency. When stereo came out, in order to remain compatible with mono, they added bumps to one side of the groove for the second channel’s information. A mono stylus is still only going to pick up the bottom of the groove, (mostly) ignoring the side information. A small amount of cross-talk will be present, so it’s not an entire loss, but still significant.
Most (but by no means ALL) portable turntables were mono, since they were more for convenience than fidelity. There were larger "portable" systems that were stereo, usually with detachable speakers, which became available in the mid- to late-60s. By the 1970’s, stereo fidelity was a much higher priority than portability and so few portables products were made. By that time, portability was served by the 8-track tape, smaller and not subject to vibration for the most part.
3 Responses to “would a monaural portable record player sound a lot different from a stereophonic one?”
Leave a Reply
March 8th, 2010 3:18 pm
It depends on the source material, way back in the 60’s mono was actually preferred, stereo was looked at as gimmicky, for instances the Beatles always put out two versions of there albums one stereo and one mono, but the mono one was considered to be better because they recorded in mono and the stereo was produced in the studio from the mono recording artificially.
References :
March 8th, 2010 3:37 pm
If it’s recorded in mono, it will sound the same in mono, even if played on stereo equipment. Stereo material, however, will sound distinctly diferent. Stereo consists of a phase relationship between the ears that gives depth (direction) to sound. Combining that depth into a single channel removes any spatial relationship.
Original vinyl discs were mono, in which a stylus (needle) would travel in a groove that consisted of bumps along the bottom that translated into frequency. When stereo came out, in order to remain compatible with mono, they added bumps to one side of the groove for the second channel’s information. A mono stylus is still only going to pick up the bottom of the groove, (mostly) ignoring the side information. A small amount of cross-talk will be present, so it’s not an entire loss, but still significant.
Most (but by no means ALL) portable turntables were mono, since they were more for convenience than fidelity. There were larger "portable" systems that were stereo, usually with detachable speakers, which became available in the mid- to late-60s. By the 1970’s, stereo fidelity was a much higher priority than portability and so few portables products were made. By that time, portability was served by the 8-track tape, smaller and not subject to vibration for the most part.
References :
March 8th, 2010 3:47 pm
an old fashioned mono portable will destroy a modern stereo LP. some time in the mid 70s, they started putting stereo pickup cartriges in mono players to avoid this problem. have a hifi service tech check yours out before playing any records, and have them upgrade the cartridge if necessary. it is a simple job and should not cost much. having a stereo pickup will not change the mono sound if done correctly
References :